ETF Exposure Map
See which ETFs truly change your exposure.
Switch the axes to map 80 funds by holdings difference, concentration, stock breadth, or high-confidence sector breadth, then compare them against any anchor ETF.
Are these ETFs actually different from SPY?
Every point compares its current equity holdings with SPY. The horizontal axis measures distinctness, while the vertical axis measures effective stock breadth.
80 ETFs shown
Switch dimensions to test a different ETF story. Sector breadth is shown only when at least 95% of the analyzed equity sleeve has a sector classification.
Browse the plotted data
| ETF | Role | Distinct from SPY | Effective holdings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Value | 100.0% | 272 | |
| International | 100.0% | 206 | |
| International | 100.0% | 37.1 | |
| International | 100.0% | 279 | |
| International | 100.0% | 36.5 | |
| Mid and small cap | 100.0% | 403 | |
| Mid and small cap | 100.0% | 840 | |
| International | 100.0% | 261 | |
| Mid and small cap | 100.0% | 296 | |
| International | 100.0% | 211 | |
| International | 100.0% | 232 | |
| International | 100.0% | 145 | |
| International | 100.0% | 39.0 | |
| International | 100.0% | 275 | |
| Dividend and income | 100.0% | 226 | |
| Sector and thematic | 99.9% | 24.3 | |
| Mid and small cap | 99.8% | 287 | |
| Sector and thematic | 98.4% | 18.5 | |
| Sector and thematic | 98.3% | 21.5 | |
| Sector and thematic | 98.3% | 19.7 | |
| Sector and thematic | 98.2% | 92.4 | |
| Sector and thematic | 98.1% | 19.7 | |
| Sector and thematic | 97.4% | 5.1 | |
| Value | 97.4% | 457 | |
| Mid and small cap | 96.9% | 689 | |
| Sector and thematic | 96.6% | 24.4 | |
| Sector and thematic | 96.5% | 9.1 | |
| Sector and thematic | 95.5% | 19.1 | |
| Dividend and income | 94.4% | 77.0 | |
| Dividend and income | 92.8% | 85.4 | |
| Dividend and income | 92.4% | 32.0 | |
| Sector and thematic | 92.0% | 40.2 | |
| Sector and thematic | 91.3% | 9.9 | |
| Sector and thematic | 90.9% | 17.7 | |
| Dividend and income | 90.7% | 27.7 | |
| Dividend and income | 90.4% | 68.5 | |
| Sector and thematic | 90.2% | 10.2 | |
| Sector and thematic | 89.5% | 40.6 | |
| Sector and thematic | 88.6% | 19.9 | |
| Dividend and income | 85.9% | 91.6 | |
| Mid and small cap | 84.5% | 210 | |
| Sector and thematic | 83.2% | 20.3 | |
| Sector and thematic | 81.6% | 17.9 | |
| Sector and thematic | 81.4% | 13.9 | |
| Sector and thematic | 70.6% | 34.8 | |
| Core market | 70.5% | 21.3 | |
| Dividend and income | 68.0% | 71.0 | |
| Dividend and income | 65.8% | 78.8 | |
| Growth | 64.6% | 25.1 | |
| Dividend and income | 62.5% | 59.2 | |
| Sector and thematic | 60.3% | 14.9 | |
| Dividend and income | 60.2% | 79.7 | |
| Sector and thematic | 60.2% | 14.4 | |
| Sector and thematic | 60.2% | 15.0 | |
| Value | 59.4% | 96.0 | |
| Core market | 57.3% | 492 | |
| Dividend and income | 47.9% | 29.5 | |
| Growth | 47.4% | 17.8 | |
| Growth | 47.3% | 34.1 | |
| Dividend and income | 45.5% | 32.2 | |
| Core market | 45.5% | 147 | |
| Growth | 45.3% | 31.9 | |
| Value | 44.9% | 79.0 | |
| Growth | 44.3% | 32.2 | |
| Growth | 44.0% | 23.3 | |
| Growth | 43.7% | 23.6 | |
| Value | 43.2% | 84.7 | |
| Growth | 41.0% | 19.8 | |
| International | 39.8% | 115 | |
| Growth | 34.1% | 22.1 | |
| Growth | 34.1% | 19.7 | |
| International | 30.7% | 90.6 | |
| Core market | 14.7% | 66.7 | |
| Core market | 14.6% | 65.8 | |
| Core market | 13.6% | 57.6 | |
| Core market | 8.0% | 51.4 | |
| Core market | 8.0% | 51.3 | |
| Core market | 5.3% | 46.1 | |
| Core market | 3.7% | 46.0 | |
| Core market | 0.0% | 43.4 |
What the map measures
Holdings distinctness
Each fund's positive-weight stock sleeve is normalized to 100%. Shared weight is the sum of the smaller normalized position in every common stock; distinctness is 100 minus that value. A fund farther right owns a more different equity sleeve.
Effective stock breadth
The inverse sum of squared normalized stock weights. It discounts tiny positions and reveals when a long holdings list is still driven by a small group of companies.
Effective sector breadth
The same concentration logic applied to classified sectors. Unclassified exposure is excluded, and a fund appears on this axis only when at least 95% of its analyzed equity sleeve has a sector classification.
The chart analyzes positive-weight equity positions only. Cash, derivatives, and other non-equity assets are excluded. Quadrants describe this filtered peer set, not investment quality. Holdings can carry different as-of dates. Read the complete methodology and limitations before using the map in a decision.