The ETF kitchen

Live as you mix

Mix your ETFs.
See what's inside.

Adjust the mix. Watch dividends, business growth, sectors and overlap change.

Your ingredients

100% in the mix

Turn one up. The others make room automatically.

Try a pinch of

What's in your bowl?

3 ETFs
Ollie, your taste tester

Let's see what these ingredients bring to the bowl.

Published dividends. Reported business growth.

Fetching the ingredients…

Your recipe notebook

Keep a mix. Try another. Load a favourite whenever you want another taste.

Saved in this browser, no email needed.

Your next favourite mix starts here.
Save a recipe, then load it whenever you want to try a new pinch.

The numbers behind the flavours

ETF percentages always total 100%. Changing one redistributes the rest proportionally. Figures use each fund's latest available positive-weight holdings, which can have different dates.

Concentration is the combined weight of the ten largest security positions. Repeated exposure adds the weight beyond the largest ETF contribution to each shared security. If one ETF contributes 8% to a position and another contributes 2%, repeated exposure is 2%. Neither concentration nor overlap is a rating of investment quality.

Mix personality

Careful, Balanced and Bold describe historical volatility relative to VT, a broad global stock ETF. We combine five years of weekly USD total returns at your current proportions, including their correlations, then compare annualized volatility with VT over exactly the same dates. The simulation restores your chosen weights each week and excludes investor taxes and trading costs.

The history uses market prices adjusted for distributions and share splits, not NAV returns. Fund expenses are already reflected. Every source is a verified USD trading line; some UCITS tickers use an alternate USD listing of the same share class. International funds' USD returns already include their actual currency exposure.

Careful means smaller historical swings within stock portfolios. It does not mean capital protection; Balanced does not mean a stock-and-bond allocation. Dividend yield, business growth, holdings concentration, ETF count and repeated exposure do not decide the label. These are product descriptions, not standardized financial risk ratings.

The three-year reading and the largest weekly peak-to-trough decline are checks on the five-year result. They do not modify the axis or predict future losses. A five-year window ending in 2026 excludes the 2020 crash. Different windows can tell different stories.

Every positive allocation needs complete, consistent history for the same five-year window. Missing returns are never treated as zero or cash, and the remaining funds are not rescaled to hide a gap. Short histories, stale data and unsupported trading currencies leave the marker blank.

    Unclassified holdings and exposure outside the published positive-weight holdings are shown separately. Unknown sectors are never guessed. Different share classes are matched by security identifier, not merged by company name.

    Full methodology
    Explore ETF comparisons & guides

    Popular overlap checks: 🇺🇸 US-listed

    🇪🇺 European UCITS

    VWCE, IWDA, CSPX & friends, using dated equity positions represented in official Vanguard and iShares holdings files. New to UCITS overlap? Start with the guide for European investors.

    Browse all funds and comparisons → · Which ETFs hold a given stock? → · ETF & stock max pain (on Quant Data) →

    Guides